Marshall v. State

236 S.W. 721, 90 Tex. Crim. 597, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 40
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 Tex. Crim. 131
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 1922·No. No. 6600.·Published

Opinion

*598 LATTIMORK, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Jasper County of the offense of possessing liquor, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

Under numerous authorities of this court it has been held that- the law making the possession of liquor penal was so amended by the recent special Session of the 37th Legislature, as to amount to a repeal of the same. Cox v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 256, No. 6423, and Petit v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 336, No. 6510, decided at the present term but not yet reported. It appearing in the instant case that appellant was prosecuted for a violation of said law, — in accordance with said decisions it will be necessary for us to reverse this case and order its dismissal, which is accordingly done.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 236 S.W. 721, 90 Tex. Crim. 597, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 40 (Tex. 1922).

236 S.W. 721 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U. S. Petit v. State
235 S.W. 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Cox v. State
234 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)