Cooper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cooper v. State

870 So. 2d 164, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 608, 2004 WL 124841

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 2004

DocketNo. 2D02-4507

StatusPublished

This text of 870 So. 2d 164 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. State, 870 So. 2d 164, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 608, 2004 WL 124841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

We find no merit in Larhonda Cooper’s challenge to her numerous convictions arising out of her theft and use of another’s credit card. However, we and the State agree with Cooper’s contention that this case must be remanded with directions for the trial court to enter amended probation and sentencing orders consistent with its order of January 29, 2003, granting Cooper’s motion to correct illegal sentence.

Affirmed but remanded with directions.

DAVIS, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHATLEY, Judge.

We find no merit in Larhonda Cooper’s challenge to her numerous convictions arising out of her theft and use of another’s credit card. However, we and the State agree with Cooper’s contention that this case must be remanded with directions for the trial court to enter amended probation and sentencing orders consistent with its order of January 29, 2003, granting Cooper’s motion to correct illegal sentence.

Affirmed but remanded with directions.

DAVIS, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 So. 2d 164, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 608, 2004 WL 124841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.