Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cooper v. State

Cooper v. State

870 So. 2d 164, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 608, 2004 WL 124841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 817 So. 2d 934 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2004·No. No. 2D02-4507·Published

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

We find no merit in Larhonda Cooper’s challenge to her numerous convictions arising out of her theft and use of another’s credit card. However, we and the State agree with Cooper’s contention that this case must be remanded with directions for the trial court to enter amended probation and sentencing orders consistent with its order of January 29, 2003, granting Cooper’s motion to correct illegal sentence.

Affirmed but remanded with directions.

DAVIS, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. State, 870 So. 2d 164, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 608, 2004 WL 124841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

870 So. 2d 164 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.