Cooper v. State
794 So. 2d 615, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1776, 2001 WL 166890
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. No. 2D00-614·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm Jeffrey Cooper’s judgments and sentences for trespass of a structure and dealing in stolen property. We reverse the judgment and sentence for petit theft because the trier of fact was statutorily barred from returning a guilty verdict on both the offense of theft and of dealing in stolen property based upon the one course of conduct alleged. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (1999).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. State, 794 So. 2d 615, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1776, 2001 WL 166890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
794 So. 2d 615 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hale v. State
838 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)