Cooper v. State

715 So. 2d 330, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9591, 1998 WL 422711
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 667 So. 2d 932
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1998·No. No. 97-4743·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying what is titled a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Although titled a motion to correct an illegal sentence, it appears that the motion is actually in the nature of a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the Department of Corrections to credit him with prison time previously awarded by the trial court. Because the motion does not name the proper respondent or allege that appellant has exhausted his available administrative remedies, we affirm.

WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ„ and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. State, 715 So. 2d 330, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9591, 1998 WL 422711 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

715 So. 2d 330 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.