Cooper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cooper v. State

794 So. 2d 615, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1776, 2001 WL 166890

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 2001

DocketNo. 2D00-614

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 794 So. 2d 615 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. State, 794 So. 2d 615, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1776, 2001 WL 166890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Jeffrey Cooper’s judgments and sentences for trespass of a structure and dealing in stolen property. We reverse the judgment and sentence for petit theft because the trier of fact was statutorily barred from returning a guilty verdict on both the offense of theft and of dealing in stolen property based upon the one course of conduct alleged. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (1999).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Jeffrey Cooper’s judgments and sentences for trespass of a structure and dealing in stolen property. We reverse the judgment and sentence for petit theft because the trier of fact was statutorily barred from returning a guilty verdict on both the offense of theft and of dealing in stolen property based upon the one course of conduct alleged. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (1999).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

794 So. 2d 615, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1776, 2001 WL 166890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack