Cooper v. State
821 So. 2d 1162, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066, 2002 WL 1559036
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 742 So. 2d 855 →
Opinion
We affirm the denial of relief, but do so without prejudice to file a sworn, legally sufficient post-conviction motion that includes an explanation of why this information could not have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence. See Alkanan v. State, 786 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Any such motion must be filed in the trial court no later than thirty days from the issuance of the mandate in this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. State, 821 So. 2d 1162, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066, 2002 WL 1559036 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
821 So. 2d 1162 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alkanan v. State
786 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)