Cooper v. State
773 So. 2d 1235, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209, 2000 WL 1816698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 742 So. 2d 855 →
Opinion
Pirsell L. Cooper appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that in his plea bargain, he did not agree to be adjudicated as a habitual violent felony offender (“HVO”). We reject this claim. The plea colloquy reveals that there was an agreement for an HVO adjudication on the counts for sale of cocaine.
Defendant also contends that he does not qualify as an HVO. The plea colloquy reflects, however, the existence of a qualifying offense. See § 775.084(l)(b)l.c., Fla. Stat. (1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. State, 773 So. 2d 1235, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209, 2000 WL 1816698 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
773 So. 2d 1235 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.