Clark v. State

718 S.W.2d 708, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 773
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 18, 1986
DocketNo. 900-85
StatusPublished

This text of 718 S.W.2d 708 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. State, 718 S.W.2d 708, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 773 (Tex. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in a bench trial of indecency with a child and the trial court assessed his punishment at 10 years confinement, probated, and a $500 fine. On appeal the Houston (1st) Court of Appeals reversed the conviction. Clark v. State, 693 S.W.2d 35 (Tex.App.—Houston (1st) 1985).

Finding that the Court of Appeals was correct in holding that the testimony of appellant’s former stepdaughter was erroneously admitted into evidence, we refuse the state’s petition for discretionary review. However, we do not necessarily approve of all of the reasons advanced by the Court of Appeals to support this holding.

McCORMICK and WHITE, JJ., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
693 S.W.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 S.W.2d 708, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-texcrimapp-1986.