Clark v. State

718 S.W.2d 708, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 773
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 814
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 1986·No. No. 900-85·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in a bench trial of indecency with a child and the trial court assessed his punishment at 10 years confinement, probated, and a $500 fine. On appeal the Houston (1st) Court of Appeals reversed the conviction. Clark v. State, 693 S.W.2d 35 (Tex.App.—Houston (1st) 1985).

Finding that the Court of Appeals was correct in holding that the testimony of appellant’s former stepdaughter was erroneously admitted into evidence, we refuse the state’s petition for discretionary review. However, we do not necessarily approve of all of the reasons advanced by the Court of Appeals to support this holding.

McCORMICK and WHITE, JJ., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 718 S.W.2d 708, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 773 (Tex. 1986).

718 S.W.2d 708 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. State
693 S.W.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)