City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Company
This text of 993 F.3d 1077 (City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CITY OF OAKLAND, A Municipal No. 19-15169 Corporation, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-04321-EMC Plaintiff-Appellee, Northern District of California, San Francisco v. ORDER WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendants-Appellants.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judges Christen, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Bennett, and Collins did not
participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 F.3d 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-oakland-v-wells-fargo-company-ca9-2021.