City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Company

993 F.3d 1077
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2021
Docket19-15169
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 993 F.3d 1077 (City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Company, 993 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CITY OF OAKLAND, A Municipal No. 19-15169 Corporation, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-04321-EMC Plaintiff-Appellee, Northern District of California, San Francisco v. ORDER WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellants.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Christen, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Bennett, and Collins did not

participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 F.3d 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-oakland-v-wells-fargo-company-ca9-2021.