Home/Washington Supreme Court/Cheney v. City of Mountlake Terrace

Cheney v. City of Mountlake Terrace

552 P.2d 184, 87 Wash. 2d 338, 1976 Wash. LEXIS 659
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 22, 1976
Docket43805
StatusPublished
Cited by55 cases

This text of 552 P.2d 184 (Cheney v. City of Mountlake Terrace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheney v. City of Mountlake Terrace, 552 P.2d 184, 87 Wash. 2d 338, 1976 Wash. LEXIS 659 (Wash. 1976).

Opinion

Brachtenbach, J.

This action involves alleged violations of the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, and RCW 47.26 (which deals with the Urban Arterial Board) by the City of Mountlake Terrace (City) and the Urban Arterial Board (UAB) in the planning, construction, and approval of funds for an urban arterial project. Consolidated on appeal is a second action against the City for injunctive relief based upon the theory that construction of the subject road project constitutes a nuisance. Plaintiffs are residents of the City and own residential property abutting upon this portion of the arterial project. Both actions were dismissed by the trial court. We affirm.

The total road project, only part of which is the subject of this appeal, is a 2.2-mile urban arterial project which lies in a general east-west direction from its beginning point at approximately 76th Avenue West to its easterly terminus at Cedar Way in the City of Mountlake Terrace. The following illustration graphically depicts the project. The project was approved by the UAB in 1968 and was a joint venture between the UAB, the cities of Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace, and Snohomish County. Prior to its adoption as an urban arterial project, the project was established on the comprehensive plan for the City and was based upon the apparent need for such a facility demonstrated at that time. Subsequent traffic studies have demonstrated a continued need for this major east-west arterial.

*340 RSFpxhY5fRC7coWdAvZHAMT6Q4vrJUZanbTAAeo5RRdgp0O

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sound Action, V. Wa State Shorelines Hearing Board
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2025
Kyle J. Branchick, V Melrose Station Homeowners Assoc.
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2023
Escala Owners Assoc., Resp/x-app V. City Of Seattle, Et Ano., Apps/x-resps
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2022
Phillips 66 Company, V. Whatcom County Washington
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2022
Robert J. Conklin, V. Marcia Bentz
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2021
Heritage Baptist Church v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management
413 P.3d 590 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2018)
Conservation Northwest v. Okanogan County
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016
Toward Responsible Dev., Apps. v. City Of Black Diamond, Res.
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014
Cascade Bicycle Club v. Puget Sound Regional Council
306 P.3d 1031 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2013)
Cascade Bicycle Club,et Al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2013
Lanzce G. Douglass, Inc. v. City of Spokane Valley
225 P.3d 448 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2010)
Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council
165 Wash. 2d 275 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Residents Opposed Turbines v. State Efsec
197 P.3d 1153 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Gebbers v. Okanogan County Public Utility District No. 1
144 Wash. App. 371 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
Gebbers v. OKANOGAN CTY. PUBLIC UTIL. DIST.
183 P.3d 324 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
Glasser v. City of Seattle, Office of Hearing Examiner
162 P.3d 1134 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2007)
Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Bd.
137 P.3d 31 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Board
133 Wash. App. 503 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
East County Reclamation Co. v. Bjornsen
105 P.3d 94 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)
Boehm v. City of Vancouver
111 Wash. App. 711 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 P.2d 184, 87 Wash. 2d 338, 1976 Wash. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheney-v-city-of-mountlake-terrace-wash-1976.