Washington § 47.26.460 Increase in funds allocated to a project—Rules—Factors.

Washington Statutes

§ 47.26.460 — Increase in funds allocated to a project—Rules—Factors.

Washington § 47.26.460

Title 47PUBLIC HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION

Ch. 47.26DEVELOPMENT IN URBAN AREAS—URBAN ARTERIALS

This text of Washington § 47.26.460 (Increase in funds allocated to a project—Rules—Factors.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wash. Rev. Code § 47.26.460 (2026).

Text

The board shall adopt reasonable rules pursuant to which funds allocated to a project may be increased upon a subsequent application of the county, city, town, or transportation benefit district constructing the project. The rules adopted by the board shall consider the following factors:

(1)The financial effect of increasing the original allocation for the project upon other urban arterial projects either approved or requested;

(2)whether the project for which an additional authorization is requested can be reduced in scope while retaining a usable segment;

(3)whether the cost of the project shown in the original application was based upon reasonable engineering estimates; and (4) whether the requested additional authorization is to pay for an expansion in the scope of work originally

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The board shall adopt reasonable rules pursuant to which funds allocated to a project may be increased upon a subsequent application of the county, city, town, or transportation benefit district constructing the project. The rules adopted by the board shall consider the following factors: (1) The financial effect of increasing the original allocation for the project upon other urban arterial projects either approved or requested; (2) whether the project for which an additional authorization is requested can be reduced in scope while retaining a usable segment; (3) whether the cost of the project shown in the original application was based upon reasonable engineering estimates; and (4) whether the requested additional authorization is to pay for an expansion in the scope of work originally approved.