Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California

Fifth Circuit

Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California

668 F.2d 795, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21845

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 12, 1982

Docket80-4017

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 F.2d 795 (Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California, 668 F.2d 795, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21845 (5th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The court has concluded that its consideration of this case would be benefited by oral argument. Accordingly, the panel opinion, 659 F.2d 670, is withdrawn. The Clerk is instructed to set the case on the oral argument calendar and to establish a supplemental briefing schedule addressing the arguments pertaining to the proper test of personal jurisdiction raised in the plaintiff-appellant’s petition for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The court has concluded that its consideration of this case would be benefited by oral argument. Accordingly, the panel opinion, 659 F.2d 670, is withdrawn. The Clerk is instructed to set the case on the oral argument calendar and to establish a supplemental briefing schedule addressing the arguments pertaining to the proper test of personal jurisdiction raised in the plaintiff-appellant’s petition for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 F.2d 795, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carole-hyman-burstein-v-the-state-bar-of-california-ca5-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack