Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California
668 F.2d 795, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21845
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 12, 1982·No. 80-4017·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
The court has concluded that its consideration of this case would be benefited by oral argument. Accordingly, the panel opinion, 659 F.2d 670, is withdrawn. The Clerk is instructed to set the case on the oral argument calendar and to establish a supplemental briefing schedule addressing the arguments pertaining to the proper test of personal jurisdiction raised in the plaintiff-appellant’s petition for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California, 668 F.2d 795, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21845 (5th Cir. 1982).
668 F.2d 795 (Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carole Hyman Burstein v. The State Bar of California
693 F.2d 511 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)