Burch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burch v. State

758 So. 2d 738, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2000 WL 628256

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 2000

DocketNo. 3D98-3257

StatusPublished

This text of 758 So. 2d 738 (Burch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burch v. State, 758 So. 2d 738, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2000 WL 628256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Barfield Burch (defendant) appeals an order denying his motion to vacate, set aside and/or correct illegal sentence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in departing from his agreed upon sentence made pursuant to a plea for his failure to appear at the initial sentencing hearing, where the failure to appear was not attributable to him. This claim is procedurally barred. In 1993 the defendant filed a previous motion for post conviction relief in which he alleged the same ground. The trial court denied relief and this court affirmed the denial. See Burch v. State, 652 So.2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). That determination is now the law of the case. See Love v. State, 559 So.2d 198, 200-01 (Fla.1990).

The defendant next contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to a fifteen year term of imprisonment in case number 89-47276 for sale of a substance in lieu of a controlled substance, a third degree felony pursuant to section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1989). The state correctly concedes that this claim has merit. Prior to the 1994 amendments to the sentencing guidelines, a term of imprisonment imposed for a felony of the third degree could not exceed the statutory maximum of five years. See § 775.082(d), Fla. Stat. (1989). Accordingly, we reverse the sentence in case number 89^47276 and remand the matter to the trial court for correction of the sentence to reflect a five year term. The defendant need not be physically present.

We reject the defendant’s final contention regarding credit for time served in case number 89-47270. The record reflects that the trial court properly awarded him 456 days credit in this case.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Barfield Burch (defendant) appeals an order denying his motion to vacate, set aside and/or correct illegal sentence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in departing from his agreed upon sentence made pursuant to a plea for his failure to appear at the initial sentencing hearing, where the failure to appear was not attributable to him. This claim is procedurally barred. In 1993 the defendant filed a previous motion for post conviction relief in which he alleged the same ground. The trial court denied relief and this court affirmed the denial. See Burch v. State, 652 So.2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). That determination is now the law of the case. See Love v. State, 559 So.2d 198, 200-01 (Fla.1990).

The defendant next contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to a fifteen year term of imprisonment in case number 89-47276 for sale of a substance in lieu of a controlled substance, a third degree felony pursuant to section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1989). The state correctly concedes that this claim has merit. Prior to the 1994 amendments to the sentencing guidelines, a term of imprisonment imposed for a felony of the third degree could not exceed the statutory maximum of five years. See § 775.082(d), Fla. Stat. (1989). Accordingly, we reverse the sentence in case number 89^47276 and remand the matter to the trial court for correction of the sentence to reflect a five year term. The defendant need not be physically present.

We reject the defendant’s final contention regarding credit for time served in case number 89-47270. The record reflects that the trial court properly awarded him 456 days credit in this case.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 So. 2d 738, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2000 WL 628256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack