Burch v. State
This text of 724 So. 2d 718 (Burch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences and the imposition of costs and a public defender’s lien. Wright v. State, 720 So.2d 313, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D2562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D2399 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). As in Locke, we certify the following question to be one of great public importance:
Does the failure of the trial court to orally pronounce each statutorily authorized cost individually at the time of sentencing constitute fundamental error?
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
724 So. 2d 718, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 818, 1999 WL 35291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.