Burch v. State
724 So. 2d 718, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 818, 1999 WL 35291
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1999·No. No. 98-996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences and the imposition of costs and a public defender’s lien. Wright v. State, 720 So.2d 313, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D2562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D2399 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). As in Locke, we certify the following question to be one of great public importance:
Does the failure of the trial court to orally pronounce each statutorily authorized cost individually at the time of sentencing constitute fundamental error?
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burch v. State, 724 So. 2d 718, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 818, 1999 WL 35291 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
724 So. 2d 718 (Burch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)