Burch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burch v. State

785 So. 2d 1264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7745, 2001 WL 611153

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burch v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 1198 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2001·No. No. 3D00-3505·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983) (When a defendant is convicted of separate criminal incidents occurring at separate times and places, each of which fall within the category of crimes requiring a mandatory three-year sentence, consecutive sentences are not mandated thereunder; however, neither are such consecutive sentences prohibited; it is within discretion of trial judge to impose concurrent or consecutive mandatory minimum sentences.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983) (When a defendant is convicted of separate criminal incidents occurring at separate times and places, each of which fall within the category of crimes requiring a mandatory three-year sentence, consecutive sentences are not mandated thereunder; however, neither are such consecutive sentences prohibited; it is within discretion of trial judge to impose concurrent or consecutive mandatory minimum sentences.)

Burch v. State, 785 So. 2d 1264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7745, 2001 WL 611153 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

785 So. 2d 1264 (Burch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related