Burch v. State

763 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2000 WL 852615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burch v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 1198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2000·No. No. 1D00-648·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his request, made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), for an additional 30 days of jail-time credit. In his motion, appellant represents that, although he was in the Hamilton County Jail from October 14, 1999, to November 22,1999, he received credit for only 8 days, rather than for 38. A sworn certificate from the Hamilton County Sheriffs Office supports appellant’s representation. In its order, the trial court said, “October 14, 1999 to November 22, 1999 clearly being 8 days, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant’s Motion is denied.” Our computations lead us to conclude that October 14 to November 22 is 38 days, as appellant claimed, and not 8 days, as found by the trial court. Accordingly, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court award appellant an additional 30 days of jail-time credit.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burch v. State, 763 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2000 WL 852615 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

763 So. 2d 1260 (Burch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.