Holley v. State

774 So. 2d 46, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13264, 2000 WL 1514896
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 2000·No. No. 2D00-2890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Dale E. Holley’s motion to withdraw his plea. From the face of the limited record before this court, it appears that there may be a problem with the sentences imposed upon the revocation of Holley’s community control. The original suspended sentences do not appear to be the habitual offender sentences that were ultimately imposed. In the event the complete record supports such a conclusion, Holley is not barred from filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holley v. State, 774 So. 2d 46, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13264, 2000 WL 1514896 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

774 So. 2d 46 (Holley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burch v. State
774 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)