Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

Ninth Circuit

Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

240 F.3d 1215, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1632, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 2109, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2915, 2001 WL 204719

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 2001

DocketNo. 99-15654

StatusPublished

This text of 240 F.3d 1215 (Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, 240 F.3d 1215, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1632, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 2109, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2915, 2001 WL 204719 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,¹ it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,¹ it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 F.3d 1215, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1632, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 2109, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2915, 2001 WL 204719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bugenig-v-hoopa-valley-tribe-ca9-2001.