Home/Ninth Circuit/Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

240 F.3d 1215, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1632, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 2109, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2915, 2001 WL 204719
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe. Read the opinion of the Court — 266 F.3d 1201 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2001·No. No. 99-15654·Published

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, 240 F.3d 1215, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1632, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 2109, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2915, 2001 WL 204719 (9th Cir. 2001).

240 F.3d 1215 (Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.