FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 53
Application of Indian liquor laws
18 U.S.C. § 1161
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter53 — INDIANS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1161 (Application of Indian liquor laws) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1161.
Text
The provisions of sections 1154, 1156, 3113, 3488, and 3669, of this title, shall not apply within any area that is not Indian country, nor to any act or transaction within any area of Indian country provided such act or transaction is in conformity both with the laws of the State in which such act or transaction occurs and with an ordinance duly adopted by the tribe having jurisdiction over such area of Indian country, certified by the Secretary of the Interior, and published in the Federal Register.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
480 U.S. 202 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax Commission
380 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Rice v. Rehner
463 U.S. 713 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
211 F.3d 1280 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
Nebraska v. Parker
577 U.S. 481 (Supreme Court, 2016)
The Squaxin Island Tribe v. The State of Washington
781 F.2d 715 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Michael Boxx v. Heather Long Warrior
265 F.3d 771 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. The State of New Mexico, and Carlos L. Jaramillo, Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
590 F.2d 323 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Mary Lucille Cowboy
694 F.2d 1228 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Martin Dewalt Mazurie
487 F.2d 14 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. County of Riverside
783 F.2d 900 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Brown v. District Court of Seventeenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Blaine
777 P.2d 877 (Montana Supreme Court, 1989)
Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation v. Mazurek
43 F.3d 428 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission
58 F.3d 654 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. Norton
324 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (N.D. California, 2004)
In Re the Welfare of B.F.W.
564 N.W.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1997)
Kialegee Tribal Town v. Bernhardt
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Attorney General Opinion No.
(Kansas Attorney General Reports, 1997)
Source Credit
History
(Added Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 502, §2, 67 Stat. 586; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §223(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2028.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–473 substituted "3669" for "3618".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–473 substituted "3669" for "3618".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1161.