FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Omitted
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
25 U.S.C. § 1300i (Omitted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shermoen v. United States
982 F.2d 1312 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Short v. United States
50 F.3d 994 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Automotive United Trades Organization v. State
285 P.3d 52 (Washington Supreme Court, 2012)
Parravano v. Babbitt
70 F.3d 539 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Karuk Tribe of California v. United States
27 Fed. Cl. 429 (Federal Claims, 1993)
Hage v. United States
35 Fed. Cl. 737 (Federal Claims, 1996)
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States
597 F.3d 1278 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Baley v. United States
942 F.3d 1312 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
Parravano v. Babbitt
861 F. Supp. 914 (N.D. California, 1994)
Karuk Tribe v. Ammon
209 F.3d 1366 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Short v. United States
28 Fed. Cl. 590 (Federal Claims, 1993)
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States
86 Fed. Cl. 430 (Federal Claims, 2009)
Baley v. United States
134 Fed. Cl. 619 (Federal Claims, 2017)
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc. (In Re Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc.)
143 B.R. 563 (N.D. California, 1992)
Yurok Tribe v. Dowd
(N.D. California, 2022)
George v. United States
901 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (N.D. California, 2012)
Klamath Irrigation v. United States
134 Fed. Cl. 619 (Federal Claims, 2017)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 100–580, §1, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2924, which provided that this subchapter could be cited as the "Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act" and set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 100–580, §1, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2924, which provided that this subchapter could be cited as the "Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act" and set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.