Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

240 F.3d 1215
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 F.3d 1210
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2001·No. 99-15654·Published

Opinion

240 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001)

ROBERTA BUGENIG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE; THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COUNCIL; THE TRIBAL COURT OF THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL RESERVATION; BYRON NELSON, Jr., HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COURT; MERV GEORGE, CHAIRMAN OF THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL CONCIL, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-15654

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

February 28, 2001

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes

1

Judge Fisher was recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, 240 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001).

240 F.3d 1215 (Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.