Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

Ninth Circuit

Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe

240 F.3d 1215

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 2001

Docket99-15654

StatusPublished

This text of 240 F.3d 1215 (Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberta Bugenig v. Hoopa Valley Tribe, 240 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

240 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001)

ROBERTA BUGENIG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE; THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COUNCIL; THE TRIBAL COURT OF THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL RESERVATION; BYRON NELSON, Jr., HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COURT; MERV GEORGE, CHAIRMAN OF THE HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL CONCIL, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-15654

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

February 28, 2001

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes

1

Judge Fisher was recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI