Brown v. State
474 S.W.3d 222, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1121, 2015 WL 6689393
Opinion
ORDER
Saudi Brown appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 474 S.W.3d 222, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1121, 2015 WL 6689393 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).
474 S.W.3d 222 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.