Home/California Court of Appeal/Brandes v. Rucker Fuller Desk Co.

Brandes v. Rucker Fuller Desk Co.

280 P. 379, 100 Cal. App. 512, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 457
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 6, 1929
DocketDocket No. 6864.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 280 P. 379 (Brandes v. Rucker Fuller Desk Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandes v. Rucker Fuller Desk Co., 280 P. 379, 100 Cal. App. 512, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 457 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Appellants' motion, upon suggestion of diminution of the record, to incorporate in the reporter's transcript now on file in this court the two instructions duly certified by the trial judge and filed herein on August 30, 1929, in order that the record shall show at whose request said instructions were given to the jury, is granted (Mahon v. Hamilton, 202 Cal. 319 [260 P. 793]). *Page 513

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stevenson v. Fleming
111 P.2d 420 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Morgan v. Neff
31 P.2d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 P. 379, 100 Cal. App. 512, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandes-v-rucker-fuller-desk-co-calctapp-1929.