Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.

Supreme Court

Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.

293 U.S. 522, 55 S. Ct. 120

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 15, 1934

DocketNo. 398

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 293 U.S. 522 (Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U.S. 522, 55 S. Ct. 120 (1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appeal from an order granting an interlocutory injunction. Jurisdictional statement has been filed. The order is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; South Carolina [523]*523Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffet Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Crandin Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Ban-corporation v. Benson, 292 TJ. S. 606.

Mr. Henry S. Manley for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appeal from an order granting an interlocutory injunction. Jurisdictional statement has been filed. The order is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; South Carolina [523]*523Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffet Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Crandin Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Ban-corporation v. Benson, 292 TJ. S. 606.

Mr. Henry S. Manley for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 U.S. 522, 55 S. Ct. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-g-a-f-seelig-inc-scotus-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack