Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.

Supreme Court

Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.

293 U.S. 522, 55 S. Ct. 120

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 15, 1934·No. No. 398·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appeal from an order granting an interlocutory injunction. Jurisdictional statement has been filed. The order is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; South Carolina [523] Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffet Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Crandin Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Ban-corporation v. Benson, 292 TJ. S. 606.

Mr. Henry S. Manley for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appeal from an order granting an interlocutory injunction. Jurisdictional statement has been filed. The order is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; South Carolina [523] Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffet Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Crandin Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Ban-corporation v. Benson, 292 TJ. S. 606.

Mr. Henry S. Manley for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U.S. 522, 55 S. Ct. 120 (1934).

Pincite

293 U.S. 522 (Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related