National Accounting Co. v. Dorman

Supreme Court

National Accounting Co. v. Dorman

295 U.S. 718, 55 S. Ct. 835

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 20, 1935·No. No. 923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Grandin Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson, 292 U. S. 606; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 [719] U. S. 522; Wilshire Oil Co. v. United States, ante, p. 100. Messrs.

Ernest Woodward, Fred R. Wright, and Ed C. O’Rear for appellant. Messrs. Bailey P. Wootten, Arthur Bensinger, and John S. Milliken for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Grandin Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson, 292 U. S. 606; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 [719] U. S. 522; Wilshire Oil Co. v. United States, ante, p. 100. Messrs.

Ernest Woodward, Fred R. Wright, and Ed C. O’Rear for appellant. Messrs. Bailey P. Wootten, Arthur Bensinger, and John S. Milliken for appellee.

National Accounting Co. v. Dorman, 295 U.S. 718, 55 S. Ct. 835 (1935).

Pincite

295 U.S. 718 (National Accounting Co. v. Dorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related