National Accounting Co. v. Dorman

295 U.S. 718, 55 S. Ct. 835
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 20, 1935
DocketNo. 923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 U.S. 718 (National Accounting Co. v. Dorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Accounting Co. v. Dorman, 295 U.S. 718, 55 S. Ct. 835 (1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Grandin Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson, 292 U. S. 606; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 [719]*719U. S. 522; Wilshire Oil Co. v. United States, ante, p. 100. Messrs.

Ernest Woodward, Fred R. Wright, and Ed C. O’Rear for appellant. Messrs. Bailey P. Wootten, Arthur Bensinger, and John S. Milliken for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eureka Productions, Inc. v. Lehman
302 U.S. 634 (Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 U.S. 718, 55 S. Ct. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-accounting-co-v-dorman-scotus-1935.