Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court

Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission

286 U.S. 525, 52 S. Ct. 495

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 18, 1932·No. No. 557·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service [526] Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co. 284 U. S. 598.

Mr. Percy J. Donovan for appellants. Messrs. Paul W. Voorhies, Attorney General of Michigan, Hugh E. Lillie, Assistant Attorney General, and K. F. Clardy were on the brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service [526] Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co. 284 U. S. 598.

Mr. Percy J. Donovan for appellants. Messrs. Paul W. Voorhies, Attorney General of Michigan, Hugh E. Lillie, Assistant Attorney General, and K. F. Clardy were on the brief for appellees.

Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission, 286 U.S. 525, 52 S. Ct. 495 (1932).

Pincite

286 U.S. 525 (Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related