Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson

292 U.S. 606, 54 S. Ct. 775
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 7, 1934·No. No. 990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per curiam:

The motion for im[607] mediate consideration of the jurisdictional statement' is granted. The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission, 278 U.S. 300, 326; Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U.S. 331, 338; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U.S. 593; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U.S. 525; Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U.S. 525.

Messrs. G. A. Youngquist, F. H. Stinchfield, and Claude G. Krause for appellant. Mr. Harry H. Peterson for appellees. Mr. Justice Butler took no part in the consideration and decision of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson, 292 U.S. 606, 54 S. Ct. 775 (1934).

292 U.S. 606 (Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co.
83 F.2d 262 (First Circuit, 1936)
National Accounting Co. v. Dorman
295 U.S. 718 (Supreme Court, 1935)