Grosjean v. Texas Co.

Supreme Court

Grosjean v. Texas Co.

297 U.S. 697, 56 S. Ct. 594

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 9, 1936

DocketNo. 555

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 297 U.S. 697 (Grosjean v. Texas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grosjean v. Texas Co., 297 U.S. 697, 56 S. Ct. 594 (1936).

Pincite

Opinion

[697]*697Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.-

Per Curiam:

The decree granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed; Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; Danger v. Grandin Farmers Coöperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Baldwin, Commissioner, v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U. S. 522.

Mr. Roberts C. Milling, with whom Messrs. Charles H. Blish and Wm. K. Hall were on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[697]*697Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.-

Per Curiam:

The decree granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed; Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; Danger v. Grandin Farmers Coöperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Baldwin, Commissioner, v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U. S. 522.

Mr. Roberts C. Milling, with whom Messrs. Charles H. Blish and Wm. K. Hall were on the brief, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 U.S. 697, 56 S. Ct. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosjean-v-texas-co-scotus-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack