Foley v. Wachs

298 U.S. 637, 56 S. Ct. 678
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 6, 1936·No. No. 856·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion' for leave to file jurisdictional statement is granted. The decree granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; Longer v. Grandin Farmers Coöperative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U. S. 522; Grosjean v. Texas Co., 297 U. S. 697.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley v. Wachs, 298 U.S. 637, 56 S. Ct. 678 (1936).

298 U.S. 637 (Foley v. Wachs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alabama v. United States
279 U.S. 229 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Langer v. Grandin Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Co.
292 U.S. 605 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.
293 U.S. 522 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Grosjean v. Texas Co.
297 U.S. 697 (Supreme Court, 1936)