Baker v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Baker v. State

974 S.W.2d 750, 1998 WL 201438

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

Docket04-97-00843-CR

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 974 S.W.2d 750 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. State, 974 S.W.2d 750, 1998 WL 201438 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Benjamin Baker (“Baker”), appeals his conviction for failing to stop and render aid. In one point of error, Baker challenges the constitutionality of section 550.021 of the Texas Transportation Code, contending the statute violates due process because it does not require that a driver have knowledge that an accident has occurred before imposing a duty to stop and render aid.

In Goss v. State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that section 6.02 of the Texas Penal Code applied to sections 38 and 40 of article 6701d, and the culpable mental state required for the offense of failing to stop and render aid is that the accused have knowledge that an accident had occurred. 582 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Tex.Crim.App.1979). In codifying sections 38 and 40 of article 6701d as sections 550.021 and 550.023 of the Texas Transportation Code, the legislature expressly stated that no substantive change in the law was intended. Act of May 23, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 165, § 25,1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 1025, 1871. Therefore, the requirement that the accused have knowledge that an accident had occurred is an element of the offense of failing to stop and render aid under section 550.021. Baker’s point of *751 error is overruled, and the judgment of the tidal court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Benjamin Baker (“Baker”), appeals his conviction for failing to stop and render aid. In one point of error, Baker challenges the constitutionality of section 550.021 of the Texas Transportation Code, contending the statute violates due process because it does not require that a driver have knowledge that an accident has occurred before imposing a duty to stop and render aid.

In Goss v. State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that section 6.02 of the Texas Penal Code applied to sections 38 and 40 of article 6701d, and the culpable mental state required for the offense of failing to stop and render aid is that the accused have knowledge that an accident had occurred. 582 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Tex.Crim.App.1979). In codifying sections 38 and 40 of article 6701d as sections 550.021 and 550.023 of the Texas Transportation Code, the legislature expressly stated that no substantive change in the law was intended. Act of May 23, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 165, § 25,1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 1025, 1871. Therefore, the requirement that the accused have knowledge that an accident had occurred is an element of the offense of failing to stop and render aid under section 550.021. Baker’s point of *751 error is overruled, and the judgment of the tidal court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

974 S.W.2d 750, 1998 WL 201438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-texapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack