Hernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hernandez v. State

709 S.W.2d 1, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1251

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 12, 1986

DocketNo. 668-85

StatusPublished

This text of 709 S.W.2d 1 (Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. State, 709 S.W.2d 1, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1251 (Tex. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of attempted capital murder. On appeal, a panel majority of the Austin Court of Appeals held that a conversation had with a juror by the complaining witness police officer was not so prejudicial as to require reversal of the conviction. Hernandez v. State, 692 S.W.2d 190 (Tex.App.-Austin 1985). We refuse the petition for discretionary review, however, our refusal of appellant’s petition for discretionary review is not to be taken as an approval of the reasoning of the Court of Appeals on this ground of error.

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

MILLER, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of attempted capital murder. On appeal, a panel majority of the Austin Court of Appeals held that a conversation had with a juror by the complaining witness police officer was not so prejudicial as to require reversal of the conviction. Hernandez v. State, 692 S.W.2d 190 (Tex.App.-Austin 1985). We refuse the petition for discretionary review, however, our refusal of appellant’s petition for discretionary review is not to be taken as an approval of the reasoning of the Court of Appeals on this ground of error.

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

MILLER, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 S.W.2d 1, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-state-texcrimapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack