Harrington v. California
393 U.S. 1010, 89 S. Ct. 636
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 13, 1969
DocketNo. 750
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 393 U.S. 1010 (Harrington v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harrington v. California, 393 U.S. 1010, 89 S. Ct. 636 (1969).
Opinion
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 949.] Motion of respondent to dispense with printing appendix denied. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and James H. Kline, Deputy Attorney General, on the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Sam Frank Urbana
412 F.2d 1081 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 1010, 89 S. Ct. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-california-scotus-1969.