Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp.
Opinions
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiff-Appellant, Avid Identification Systems, Inc. (“Avid”). Separately, Avid filed a motion to join in the pending en bane review in Therasense v. Becton Dickinson and Co., 2008-1511, 2008-1512, 2008-1513, 2008-1514, 2008-1595 or, alternatively, to stay the mandate of this case pending disposition of Therasense. The panel denied Avid’s motion. The combined petition and motion were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The motion to join in the pending en banc review in Therasense v. Becton Dickinson and Co., 2008-1511, 2008-1512, 2008-1513, 2008-1514, 2008-1595 or, alternatively, to stay the mandate of this ease is denied.
(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on July 23, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
614 F.3d 1330 (Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.