Hood v. United States

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 24, 2016
Docket15-1158
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hood v. United States (Hood v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. United States, (uscfc 2016).

Opinion

ORIGINAL

3Jn tbe mntteb ~tates QCourt of jfeberal QClaims No. 15-l 158C

(Filed: February 24, 2016) FILED FEB 24 2016 ) U.S. COURT OF JULIAN R. HOOD, ) FEDERAL CLAIMS ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)

ORDER

On November 30, 2015, plaintiff in the above-captioned case, Mr. Julian Hood, appearing pro se, filed a complaint in this court. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff also filed with his complaint an application to appear in forma pauperis (IFP), seeking permission to proceed without paying the court's filing fee . Dkt. No. 3.

The court determined that Mr. Hood's assets and history of vexatious litigation barred him from proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and thus denied his application. Order, Feb. 11, 2016, ECF No. 12. The court provided notice to plaintiff that failure to remit the filing fee by February 19, 2016, would result in dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Rule 41 (b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Id. at 2-3.

As of the date of this order, plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee. Because plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's order, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hood v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-united-states-uscfc-2016.