Atkins v. County of Barnstable
This text of 97 Mass. 428 (Atkins v. County of Barnstable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The instructions were in conformity to the decided cases and in all respects sufficiently favorable to the [430]*430plaintiff. As to his right to recover on the first count, the agreement was express that the work should be done to the satisfaction' of the county commissioners. The plaintiff was bound to show such acceptance in order to maintain an action on the written contract to recover the agreed price. McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray, 139. As to a recovery on the second count, the elements necessary to establish a claim against the defendants and the measure by which the damages were to be assessed were correctly stated by the court. Hayward v. Leonard, 7 Pick. 181. Smith v. Lowell, 8 Pick. 181. Snow v. Ware, 13 Met. 42. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 Mass. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-county-of-barnstable-mass-1867.