Atkins v. County of Barnstable

97 Mass. 428
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Bigelow, C. J.

The instructions were in conformity to the decided cases and in all respects sufficiently favorable to the [430]*430plaintiff. As to his right to recover on the first count, the agreement was express that the work should be done to the satisfaction' of the county commissioners. The plaintiff was bound to show such acceptance in order to maintain an action on the written contract to recover the agreed price. McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray, 139. As to a recovery on the second count, the elements necessary to establish a claim against the defendants and the measure by which the damages were to be assessed were correctly stated by the court. Hayward v. Leonard, 7 Pick. 181. Smith v. Lowell, 8 Pick. 181. Snow v. Ware, 13 Met. 42. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkins v. County of Barnstable, 97 Mass. 428 (Mass. 1867).

97 Mass. 428 (Atkins v. County of Barnstable) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnston v. Brown
348 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Cerrone v. Lynn Mutual Insurance
46 Mass. App. Dec. 44 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1971)
See v. Nesson
144 N.E. 238 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
City of Boston v. McGovern
292 F. 705 (First Circuit, 1923)
McGovern v. City of Boston
229 Mass. 394 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. Swenson
166 N.W. 406 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
Bowen v. Kimbell
203 Mass. 364 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
C. W. Hunt Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
85 N.E. 446 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Gillis v. Cobe
59 N.E. 455 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Connolly v. Sullivan
53 N.E. 143 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Blood v. Wilson
6 N.E. 362 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
Bozarth v. Dudley
44 N.J.L. 304 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1882)
Fitzgerald v. Allen
128 Mass. 232 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)