Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Armstrong v. State

Armstrong v. State

636 So. 2d 588, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4713, 1994 WL 182724
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2618
StatusPublished

This text of 636 So. 2d 588 (Armstrong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. State, 636 So. 2d 588, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4713, 1994 WL 182724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In appealing his sentence, Truman Armstrong claims that the trial court did not award him the proper amount of credit for the time he has served in prison. Armstrong has failed to provide this court with a record establishing error and, therefore, his sentence must be affirmed. See Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), quashed on other grounds, 594 So.2d 290 (Fla.1992). We note that Armstrong may properly raise this issue before the trial court by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
568 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Williams v. State
594 So. 2d 290 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
636 So. 2d 588, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4713, 1994 WL 182724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.