Goodloe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goodloe v. State

652 So. 2d 981, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3517, 1995 WL 150259

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1738

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 652 So. 2d 981 (Goodloe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodloe v. State, 652 So. 2d 981, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3517, 1995 WL 150259 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

Ricky Goodloe appeals from the judgments and sentences entered for three misdemeanors arising from a high speed chase. We find his contention that the trial court abused its discretion by consolidating the misdemeanors with a related felony charge to be without merit because all charges arose from a single criminal episode. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.150(a).

Goodloe’s assertion that the trial court erred by sentencing him to consecutive terms in the county jail for the misdemeanor offenses is also without merit. Our decision is controlled by this court’s opinion in Armstrong v. State, 640 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review granted, 650 So.2d 989 (Fla.1994). As we did in Armstrong, we acknowledge conflict with McGauley v. State, 632 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI