Armstrong v. State
659 So. 2d 489, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9124, 1995 WL 509289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armstrong v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 620 So. 2d 1120 →
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed. We remand with directions to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment, namely, to reflect that count I was a conviction for a first degree felony, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon causing serious bodily injury, under sections 784.045 and 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1991). See Lareau v. State, 573 So.2d 813, 815 (Fla.1991).
Affirmed; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. State, 659 So. 2d 489, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9124, 1995 WL 509289 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
659 So. 2d 489 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lareau v. State
573 So. 2d 813 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)