Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Armstrong v. State

Armstrong v. State

636 So. 2d 588, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4713, 1994 WL 182724
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armstrong v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 620 So. 2d 1120 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1994·No. No. 93-2618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In appealing his sentence, Truman Armstrong claims that the trial court did not award him the proper amount of credit for the time he has served in prison. Armstrong has failed to provide this court with a record establishing error and, therefore, his sentence must be affirmed. See Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), quashed on other grounds, 594 So.2d 290 (Fla.1992). We note that Armstrong may properly raise this issue before the trial court by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. State, 636 So. 2d 588, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4713, 1994 WL 182724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 588 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
568 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Williams v. State
594 So. 2d 290 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)