Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armstrong v. State

650 So. 2d 1139, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 1995 WL 96587

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1424

StatusPublished

This text of 650 So. 2d 1139 (Armstrong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. State, 650 So. 2d 1139, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 1995 WL 96587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

In this Anders appeal¹ a scrivener’s error appears in the written judgment in Case No. 93-953, one of the two lower court eases under review. We strike the adjudication of guilt for Count II, committing a lewd act in the presence of a child, as the state nol prossed that count. In all other respects, the judgments and sentencing dispositions in Case Nos. 93-953 and 93-954 are affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GOSHORN, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

In this Anders appeal¹ a scrivener’s error appears in the written judgment in Case No. 93-953, one of the two lower court eases under review. We strike the adjudication of guilt for Count II, committing a lewd act in the presence of a child, as the state nol prossed that count. In all other respects, the judgments and sentencing dispositions in Case Nos. 93-953 and 93-954 are affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GOSHORN, J„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 So. 2d 1139, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 1995 WL 96587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack