Armour v. City of Anniston

Fifth Circuit

Armour v. City of Anniston

622 F.2d 1226, 24 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 528, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15713, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,421

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 15, 1980·No. No. 77-1778·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ORDER:

Considering the order entered by the United States Supreme Court in Armour v. City of Anniston, d/b/a Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1334, 63 L.Ed.2d 774 (1980), the case is remanded to the district court to determine, after such hearing or hearings as it may see fit, whether or not there is still a live controversy involving the proposed class, and, if so, whether or not Mrs. Armour is a proper class representative, and, if she is not, to substitute an appropriate class representative should one desire to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ORDER:

Considering the order entered by the United States Supreme Court in Armour v. City of Anniston, d/b/a Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1334, 63 L.Ed.2d 774 (1980), the case is remanded to the district court to determine, after such hearing or hearings as it may see fit, whether or not there is still a live controversy involving the proposed class, and, if so, whether or not Mrs. Armour is a proper class representative, and, if she is not, to substitute an appropriate class representative should one desire to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226, 24 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 528, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15713, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,421 (5th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

622 F.2d 1226 (Armour v. City of Anniston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related