Armour v. City of Anniston
445 U.S. 940, 100 S. Ct. 1334, 63 L. Ed. 2d 774, 22 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 439, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 1230, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,717
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 24, 1980·No. No. 79-5649·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certio-rari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States Parole Comm’n v. Geraghty, ante, p. 388, and Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. Roper, ante, p. 326.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armour v. City of Anniston, 445 U.S. 940, 100 S. Ct. 1334, 63 L. Ed. 2d 774, 22 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 439, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 1230, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,717 (1980).
445 U.S. 940 (Armour v. City of Anniston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. I.T.T.
718 F.2d 994 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
Darlene R. White, Individually and on Behalf of the Class v. I.T.T., a Corporation International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation: Xyz Corporation, D/B/A I.T.T.
718 F.2d 994 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
Berry v. Pierce
98 F.R.D. 237 (E.D. Texas, 1983)
Harris v. Ballone
681 F.2d 225 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
Ida Vene ARMOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ANNISTON, Etc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
654 F.2d 382 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 425, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,613 John S. Ford, Willie Cain v. United States Steel Corporation, Etc.
638 F.2d 753 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,421 Ida Vene Armour v. City of Anniston, D/B/A Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board
622 F.2d 1226 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Armour v. City of Anniston
622 F.2d 1226 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Kentucky ex rel. Stephens v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
626 F.2d 995 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
626 F.2d 995 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)