24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,421 Ida Vene Armour v. City of Anniston, D/B/A Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board

622 F.2d 1226
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 1980
Docket77-1778
StatusPublished

This text of 622 F.2d 1226 (24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,421 Ida Vene Armour v. City of Anniston, D/B/A Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,421 Ida Vene Armour v. City of Anniston, D/B/A Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

622 F.2d 1226

24 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 528,
24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,421
Ida Vene ARMOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ANNISTON, d/b/a Anniston Memorial Hospital and
Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 77-1778.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 15, 1980.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, J. Foy Guin, Judge.

Edward Still, Susan W. Reeves, Birmingham, Ala., Neil Bradley, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter J. Merrill, Anniston, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Before MORGAN, FAY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ORDER:

Considering the order entered by the United States Supreme Court in Armour v. City of Anniston, d/b/a Anniston Memorial Hospital and Northeast Alabama Medical Center Board, ---- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 1334, 63 L.Ed.2d 774 (1980), the case is remanded to the district court to determine, after such hearing or hearings as it may see fit, whether or not there is still a live controversy involving the proposed class, and, if so, whether or not Mrs. Armour is a proper class representative, and, if she is not, to substitute an appropriate class representative should one desire to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armour v. City of Anniston
622 F.2d 1226 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Armour v. City of Anniston
445 U.S. 940 (Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 F.2d 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/24-fair-emplpraccas-528-24-empl-prac-dec-p-31421-ida-vene-armour-v-ca5-1980.