David L. Shepard, Jr. v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.

638 F.2d 909, 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 100, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19747
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 2, 1981·No. 76-4229·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In light of intervening decisions, including Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 5th Cir. 1981, 634 F.2d 231, (En Banc Decision on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States); Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) (On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States), the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether there exists a live controversy involving the proposed class; if so, whether Mr. Shepard is a proper class representative; if not, whether an appropriate class representative wishes to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David L. Shepard, Jr. v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc., 638 F.2d 909, 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 100, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19747 (5th Cir. 1981).

638 F.2d 909 (David L. Shepard, Jr. v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related