Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

760 F.2d 87, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1852, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29524, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,363

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Fed eral Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GAR-WOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.