Home/Fifth Circuit/Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

760 F.2d 87, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1852, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29524, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,363
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1985
Docket83-1415
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 760 F.2d 87 (Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, 760 F.2d 87, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1852, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29524, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,363 (5th Cir. 1985).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Fed[88]*88eral Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GAR-WOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas State Teachers Association v. Garland Independent School District
837 F.2d 190 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Daggett, George T. v. Kimmelman, Irwin I., Etc., Forsythe, Edwin B., and Cross-Appellees v. Kean, Thomas H., Etc., James J. Florio, Defendants-Intervenors, Carmen A. Orechio and Alan J. Karcher, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees and Cross-Appellants
811 F.2d 793 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Daggett v. Kimmelman
811 F.2d 793 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
760 F.2d 87 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
760 F.2d 87, 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1852, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29524, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-m-uviedo-plaintiff-appellee-v-steves-sash-and-door-company-ca5-1985.