FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Same; modification or correction; grounds; order
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
In either of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order modifying or correcting the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration—
(a)Where there was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award.
(b)Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, unless it is a matter not affecting the merits of the decision upon the matter submitted.
(c)Where the award is imperfect in matter of form not affecting the merits of the controversy.
The order may modify and correct the award, so as to effect the intent thereof and promote justice between the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
9 U.S.C. § 11 (Same; modification or correction; grounds; order) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prestige Ford v. Ford Dealer Computer Services, Inc.
324 F.3d 391 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
R.M. Perez & Associates, Inc. v. Welch
960 F.2d 534 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Grain v. Trinity Health, Mercy Health Services Inc.
551 F.3d 374 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Champ v. Siegel Trading Co.
55 F.3d 269 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
Eljer Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kowin Development Corp.
14 F.3d 1250 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Mical v. Glick
581 F. App'x 568 (Seventh Circuit, 2014)
Transnitro, Inc. v. M/V Wave
943 F.2d 471 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)
Cole v. Hiller
715 So. 2d 451 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)
Kilgore v. Mullenax
2017 Ark. 204 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2017)
Universal Insurance v. Warrantech Consumer Product Services, Inc.
849 F. Supp. 2d 227 (D. Puerto Rico, 2012)
Grp. III Mgmt., Inc. v. Suncrete of Carolina, Inc.
819 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018)
Southeast Construction, L.L.C. v. War Construction, Inc.
110 So. 3d 371 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2012)
Anteon Corp. v. BTG, Inc.
62 Va. Cir. 41 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 2003)
Greenway Capital Corp. v. Schneider
494 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. v. G3 Analytics, LLC
336 F. Supp. 3d 924 (E.D. Illinois, 2018)
Google LLC v. Spivak
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Tilray Brands Inc v. Dickson
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,659 Hayden McIlroy v. Painewebber, Incorporated
989 F.2d 817 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
Troegel v. Performance Energy Services, LLC
(M.D. Louisiana, 2020)
Johnson v. Pizza Hut
(W.D. Arkansas, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 673.)
Editorial Notes
Derivation
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §11, 43 Stat. 885.
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §11, 43 Stat. 885.